Re: Is EOLDSNAPC actually generated? -- Re: Ceph and Netfslib

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



That's a good point, though there is no code on the client that can
generate this error, I'm not convinced that this error can't be
received from the OSD or the MDS. I would rather some MDS experts
chime in, before taking any drastic measures.

+ Greg, Venky, Patrik

On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 6:34 PM David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Alex, Slava,
>
> I'm looking at making a ceph_netfs_write_iter() to handle writing to ceph
> files through netfs.  One thing I'm wondering about is the way
> ceph_write_iter() handles EOLDSNAPC.  In this case, it goes back to
> retry_snap and renegotiates the caps (amongst other things).  Firstly, does it
> actually need to do this?  And, secondly, I can't seem to find anything that
> actually generates EOLDSNAPC (or anything relevant that generates ERESTART).
>
> Is it possible that we could get rid of the code that handles EOLDSNAPC?
>
> David
>






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux