Re: [PATCH] the dm-loop target

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 10:03:42PM +0100, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> Swapfile does ahead of time mapping.

It does.  But it is:

 a) protected against modification by the S_SWAPFILE flag and checked
    for full allocation first
 b) something we want to get rid of because even with the above it is
    rather problematic

> And I just looked at what swapfile 
> does and copied the logic into dm-loop. If swapfile is not broken, how 
> could dm-loop be broken?

As said above, swapfile works around the brokenness in ways that you
can't.  And just blindly copying old code without understanding it is
never a good idea.

> 
> > > Would Jens Axboe agree to merge the dm-loop logic into the existing loop 
> > > driver?
> > 
> > What logic?
> 
> The ahead-of-time mapping.

As said multiple times you can't do that.  The block mapping is
file system private information.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux