On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 09:20:41PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> No dentries are ever hashed on those, so ->d_delete() wouldn't be
> even looked at. If it's unhashed, we are not retaining it in dcache
> once the refcount hits zero, no matter what.
>
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
Patches to remove this have already been merged into mainline.
> fs/nsfs.c | 1 -
> fs/pidfs.c | 1 -
> 2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nsfs.c b/fs/nsfs.c
> index 663f8656158d..f7fddf8ecf73 100644
> --- a/fs/nsfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nsfs.c
> @@ -37,7 +37,6 @@ static char *ns_dname(struct dentry *dentry, char *buffer, int buflen)
> }
>
> const struct dentry_operations ns_dentry_operations = {
> - .d_delete = always_delete_dentry,
> .d_dname = ns_dname,
> .d_prune = stashed_dentry_prune,
> };
> diff --git a/fs/pidfs.c b/fs/pidfs.c
> index 63f9699ebac3..c0478b3c55d9 100644
> --- a/fs/pidfs.c
> +++ b/fs/pidfs.c
> @@ -521,7 +521,6 @@ static char *pidfs_dname(struct dentry *dentry, char *buffer, int buflen)
> }
>
> const struct dentry_operations pidfs_dentry_operations = {
> - .d_delete = always_delete_dentry,
> .d_dname = pidfs_dname,
> .d_prune = stashed_dentry_prune,
> };
> --
> 2.39.5
>
