Re: [PATCH 01/21] procfs: kill ->proc_dops

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 26 Feb 2025, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Mon 24-02-25 21:20:31, Al Viro wrote:
> > It has two possible values - one for "forced lookup" entries, another
> > for the normal ones.  We'd be better off with that as an explicit
> > flag anyway and in addition to that it opens some fun possibilities
> > with ->d_op and ->d_flags handling.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> FWIW I went through the patches and I like them. They look mostly
> straightforward enough to me and as good simplifications.
> 

Ditto.  Nice clean-up
It might be good to document s_d_flags and particularly the value of
setting DCACHE_DONTCACHE.  That flag is documented in the list of
DCACHE_ flags, but making the connection that it can usefully be put in
s_d_flags might be a step to far for many.

Thanks,
NeilBrown




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux