Re: [Regression] Filesystem I/O is CPU-bound in rc7 and rc8

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday 14 February 2010, James Cloos wrote:
> Sometime between rc6 and rc7 all filesystem I/O started using 100% CPU,
> usually on the order of 60% sys, 40% user.
> 
> I've tried this with each of ext4, jfs and btrfs filesystems.  All show
> the same issue.
> 
> Using dd(1) to read from the block specials directly works as well and
> as fast as it always has; only reading or writing to mounted filesystems
> is affected.
> 
> Box is 32-bit x86, PentiumIII-M; drives are ide using libata.
> 
> If the btrfs fs is mounted, the slowdown is enought to trigger the
> hung_task call trace (120s) on the btrfs-transac process.
> 
> But the regression is just as apparent when only jfs and ext4 are mounted.
> 
> The only filesystems I've found which avoid the regression are tmpfs and
> devtmpfs.
> 
> I didn't have time to write up a report when I noticed this in rc7 but
> had to boot back into rc6 for work.
> 
> Some of the commits since rc7 looked like they might have addressed this
> regression, but it persists in rc8.

I have created the bug entry at http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15306
for your report.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux