On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 12:24 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > So, if I understand you correctly, your suggestion might work, we > simply need to rename the lib/hweight.c versions to __sw_hweightN > and have <asm-generic/bitops/arch_hweight.h> have __arch_hweightN -> > __sw_hweightN wrappers in the default case, all arches which have an > optimized version will provide it in their respective bitops header... > I'm not quite sure what the last 'it' refers to, does that refer to: 1) an __arch_hweightN() implementation, or 2) __arch_hweightN() -> __sw_hweightN() wrappers ? If you meant 1, then yes. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
