On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 03:12:08PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > We now can support blocksizes larger than PAGE_SIZE, so in theory > we should be able to lift the restriction up to the max supported page > cache order. However bound ourselves to what we can currently validate > and test. Through blktests and fstest we can validate up to 64k today. > > Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h > index 248416ecd01c..a89513302977 100644 > --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h > +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ > #include <linux/xarray.h> > #include <linux/file.h> > #include <linux/lockdep.h> > +#include <linux/pagemap.h> We can drop this until we actually use > + * We should strive for 1 << (PAGE_SHIFT + MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER) right? I don't see anything else that needs this include.
