> > Hi, > > > I didn't discuss which behavior is better. Michael said he want to apply > > his patch to 2.6.32 & 2.6.33. stable tree never accept the breaking > > compatibility patch. > > > > Your answer doesn't explain why can't we wait it until next merge window. > > > > > > btw, personally, I like page size indepent stack size. but I'm not sure > > why making stack size independency is related to bug fix. > > OK sorry, I misunderstood your initial mail. I agree fixing the bit that > regressed in 2.6.32 is the most important thing. The difference in page size is > clearly wrong but since it isn't a regression we could probably live with it > until 2.6.34 thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
