Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] fs/buffer: simplify block_read_full_folio() with bh_offset()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 08:17:32AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 2/5/25 23:03, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 05:18:20PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > > One wonders: shouldn't we use plugging here to make I/O more efficient?
> > 
> > Should we plug at a higher level?
> > 
> > Opposite question: What if getblk() needs to do a read (ie ext2 indirect
> > block)?
> 
> Ah, that. Yes, plugging on higher level would be a good idea.
> (And can we check for nested plugs? _Should_ we check for nested plugs?)

I think given the discussion less is more for now, and if we really want
this we can add it later. Thoughts?

  Luis




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux