On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 10:36:51AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > The crc32c generation and validation looks decent though we're > > > definitely going to want an inode flag so that we're not stuck with > > > stable page writes. > > > > Yeah, support the NOCOW flag, have a sb flag to enable the checksums, > > maybe even a field about what checksum to use, yodda, yodda. > > Why do we need nocow? Won't the block contents and the PI data get > written in an untorn fashion? I mean to say NODATASUM, not NOCOW. Sorry for the confusion that this caused.
