Re: [PATCH] pipe: don't update {a,c,m}time for anonymous pipes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pipe: don't update {a,c,m}time for anonymous pipes
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 16:55:15 +0100
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>, David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@xxxxxxx>, K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@xxxxxxx>, Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@xxxxxxxxx>, Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@xxxxxxx>, Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@xxxxxxxxx>, Swapnil Sapkal <swapnil.sapkal@xxxxxxx>, WangYuli <wangyuli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAHk-=whwYt=hRk3EG7ASM-=xi3Xp7f82Ltqa=dtbVfZnGhN9ow@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

On 02/04, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> IOW, we should have "anon_pipe_read()" and "anon_pipe_write()", and
> then the named pipes just do

OK, will do in v2.

Oleg.

References:
- [PATCH] pipe: don't update {a,c,m}time for anonymous pipes
  - From: Oleg Nesterov
- Re: [PATCH] pipe: don't update {a,c,m}time for anonymous pipes
  - From: Linus Torvalds

Prev by Date: [syzbot] [bcachefs?] general protection fault in __d_lookup
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] statmount: add a new supported_mask field
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] pipe: don't update {a,c,m}time for anonymous pipes
Next by thread: [PATCH v4 00/10] iomap: incremental per-operation iter advance
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux