Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] File system checksum offload

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 06:46:49PM +1030, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> It's pretty common to reproduce, just start a VM with an image on btrfs, set
> the VM cache mode to none (aka, using direct IO), and run XFS/EXT4 inside
> the VM, run some fsstress it should cause btrfs to hit data csum mismatch
> false alerts.
> 
> The root cause is the content change during direct IO, and XFS/EXT4 doesn't
> wait for folio writeback before dirtying the folio (if no AS_STABLE_WRITES
> set).
> That's a valid optimization, but that will cause contents change.

XFS honours the bdev flag:

static inline void xfs_update_stable_writes(struct xfs_inode *ip)
{
        if (bdev_stable_writes(xfs_inode_buftarg(ip)->bt_bdev))
                mapping_set_stable_writes(VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping);
        else
                mapping_clear_stable_writes(VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping);
}

so this is a block layer issue if it's not set.

> (I know there is the AS_STABLE_WRITES, but I'm not sure if qemu will pass
> that flag to virtio block devices inside the VM)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux