Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Lustre filesystem upstreaming

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 08:50:02PM +0000, Day, Timothy wrote:
> While much of that has been addressed since - the kernel is a
> moving target. Several filesystems have been merged (or removed)
> since Lustre left staging. We're aiming to avoid the mistakes of
> the past and hope to address as many concerns as possible before
> submitting for inclusion.

That's because they have a (mor eor less normal) development model
and a stable on-disk / on-the-wire protocol.

I think you guys needs to sort your internal mess out first.
Consolidate the half a dozend incompatible versions, make sure you
have a documented and stable on-disk version and don't require
all participants to run exactly the same version.  After that just
send patches just like everyone else.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux