Re: [git pull] d_revalidate pile

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 10:40:59PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 09:34:56PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:

If so, then
	a) it's a false positive (and IIRC, it's not the first time
kfence gets confused by that)
	b) your bisection will probably converge to bdd9951f60f9
"dissolve external_name.u into separate members" which is where we'd
ended up with offsetof(struct external_name, name) being 4 modulo 8.

As a quick test, try to flip the order of head and count in
struct external_name and see if that makes the warning go away.
If it does, I'm pretty certain that theory above is correct.

Not quite...   dentry_string_cmp() assumes that ->d_name.name is
word-aligned, so load_unaligned_zeropad() is done only to the
second string (the one we compare against).

Sorry for the silence on my end: this issue doesn't reproduce
consistently, so I need to do more runs for these tests.

--
Thanks,
Sasha




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux