On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 at 11:49, Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This being your revert I was lowkey hoping you would do the honors. If it had been a plain revert, I would have - but while the general layout of the code is similar, the code around this area has changed enough that it really needs to be pretty much entirely "fix up by hand" and wants some care and testing. Which I am unlikely to have time for during this merge window. So if you don't get around to it, and _if_ I remember this when the merge window is open, I might do it in my local tree, but then it will end up being too late for this merge window. Linus