Re: [PATCH 0/5] fuse: over-io-uring fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 1/24/25 19:56, Joanne Koong wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 1:00 AM Luis Henriques <luis@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Bernd,
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 23 2025, Bernd Schubert wrote:
>>
>>> This is a list of fixes that came up from review of Luis
>>> and smatch run from Dan.
>>> I didn't put in commit id in the "Fixes:" line, as it is
>>> fuse-io-uring is in linux next only and might get rebases
>>> with new IDs.
>>
>> Thank you for this, Bernd.  And sorry for the extra work -- I should have
>> sent these patches myself instead of simply sending review comments. :-(
> 
> Sorry for the delay, I haven't gotten to looking at the latter
> io-uring patches (10 to 17) yet in v10.
> If there are any minor fixes, Bernd do you prefer that we send review
> comments or that we send patches on top of the for-next tree? Thanks
> for your hard work on this io-uring series.

Either way is fine.  And thanks for all your reviews!


Cheersm
Bernd




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux