> -----Original Message----- > From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Al Viro > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2025 11:49 PM > To: Borah, Chaitanya Kumar <chaitanya.kumar.borah@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; intel-xe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Kurmi, > Suresh Kumar <suresh.kumar.kurmi@xxxxxxxxx>; Saarinen, Jani > <jani.saarinen@xxxxxxxxx>; linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Regression on linux-next (next-20250120) > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 03:41:08PM +0000, Borah, Chaitanya Kumar wrote: > > Hello Al, > > > > Hope you are doing well. I am Chaitanya from the linux graphics team in > Intel. > > > > This mail is regarding a regression we are seeing in our CI runs[1] on linux- > next repository. > > > > Since the version next-20250120 [2], we are seeing the following > > regression > > Ugh... To narrow the things down, could you see if replacing > fsd = kmalloc(sizeof(*fsd), GFP_KERNEL); with > fsd = kzalloc(sizeof(*fsd), GFP_KERNEL); in > fs/debugfs/file.c:__debugfs_file_get() affects the test? This change seems to help. Can we expect a fix patch? Thank you. Regards Chaitanya
