On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 11:04:50AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/richacl_posix.c | 7 +++++++
> include/linux/richacl.h | 10 ++++++----
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/richacl_posix.c b/fs/richacl_posix.c
> index 07db970..3cf2124 100644
> --- a/fs/richacl_posix.c
> +++ b/fs/richacl_posix.c
> @@ -183,6 +183,13 @@ static void posix_to_richacl(struct posix_acl *pacl, int type,
> acl->a_group_mask = richacl_mode_to_mask(mode >> 3);
> acl->a_other_mask = richacl_mode_to_mask(mode);
>
> + /*
> + * Mark that the acl as mapped from posix
> + * This gives user space the chance to verify
> + * whether the mapping was correct
> + */
How would it use this information? (And how could it be incorrect?)
--b.
> + acl->a_flags |= ACL4_POSIX_MAPPED;
> +
> return;
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/richacl.h b/include/linux/richacl.h
> index b08fdf1..41d93d8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/richacl.h
> +++ b/include/linux/richacl.h
> @@ -36,12 +36,14 @@ struct richacl {
> #define ACL4_AUTO_INHERIT 0x01
> #define ACL4_PROTECTED 0x02
> #define ACL4_DEFAULTED 0x04
> +#define ACL4_POSIX_MAPPED 0x10
> #define ACL4_WRITE_THROUGH 0x40
>
> -#define ACL4_VALID_FLAGS ( \
> - ACL4_AUTO_INHERIT | \
> - ACL4_PROTECTED | \
> - ACL4_DEFAULTED | \
> +#define ACL4_VALID_FLAGS ( \
> + ACL4_AUTO_INHERIT | \
> + ACL4_PROTECTED | \
> + ACL4_DEFAULTED | \
> + ACL4_POSIX_MAPPED | \
> ACL4_WRITE_THROUGH)
>
> /* e_type values */
> --
> 1.7.0.rc0.48.gdace5
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
