Re: [RFC] EOPENSTALE handling in path_openat()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 at 06:40, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Miklos, could you recall what was the original intent of that?
> Do we want to keep that logics there, or should it just turn into
> "map -ENOPENSTALE to -ESTALE??

I think the intent was to prevent a full LOOKUP_REVAL if this happened
on the first try in do_filp_open().  I still think that makes sense,
but needs a comment since it's not obvious.

Thanks,
Miklos




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux