Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] time to reconsider tracepoints in the vfs?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> that it's not a big deal.  I'm watching with a bit of concern developments
> like BTF which try to provide some illusion of stability where there isn't
> much of it. So some tool could spread wide enough without getting regularly
> broken that breaking it will become a problem. But that is not really the
> topic of this discussion.

We've stated over and over and will document that we give no stability
guarantees in that regard.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux