On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 23:03:53 -0500 Thiago Farina <tfransosi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > warning: do-while statement is not a compound statement > > Signed-off-by: Thiago Farina <tfransosi@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/binfmt_elf.c | 4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/binfmt_elf.c b/fs/binfmt_elf.c > index edd90c4..75d6468 100644 > --- a/fs/binfmt_elf.c > +++ b/fs/binfmt_elf.c > @@ -1404,9 +1404,9 @@ static void fill_auxv_note(struct memelfnote *note, struct mm_struct *mm) > { > elf_addr_t *auxv = (elf_addr_t *) mm->saved_auxv; > int i = 0; > - do > + do { > i += 2; > - while (auxv[i - 2] != AT_NULL); > + } while (auxv[i - 2] != AT_NULL); > fill_note(note, "CORE", NT_AUXV, i * sizeof(elf_addr_t), auxv); > } hmpf. Which tool emitted that warning? sparse? It is somewhat unconventional coding style and it'd be good if checkpatch were to warn so that we don't _add_ such things to the tree. But IMO it's such a minor thing that once it _is_ in the tree, it's not really worth the patch noise to go and fix it up. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html