Re: [PATCH 3/6] iomap: support incremental iomap_iter advances

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 12:50:26PM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> Yeah, I agree this is a wart. Another option I thought about was
> creating a new flag to declare which iteration mode a particular
> operation uses, if for nothing else but to improve clarity.

I actually really like the model where the processing loop always
advances.  It'll make a few things I have on my mind much easier.

That doesn't mean I want to force you to go all the way for the initial
patch series, but I'd love to see a full switchover, and preferably
without a too long window of having both.

> reason.. would we think this is a worthwhile iteration cleanup on its
> own?

Yes.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux