On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 23:05:56 -0800 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > - Remove PTE_DEVMAP definitions from Loongarch which were added since > > this series was initially written. > [..] > > > > base-commit: e25c8d66f6786300b680866c0e0139981273feba > > If this is going to go through nvdimm.git I will need it against a > mainline tag baseline. Linus will want to see the merge conflicts. > > Otherwise if that merge commit is too messy, or you would rather not > rebase, then it either needs to go one of two options: > > - Andrew's tree which is the only tree I know of that can carry > patches relative to linux-next. I used to be able to do that but haven't got around to setting up such a thing with mm.git. This is the first time the need has arisen, really. > - Wait for v6.14-rc1 I'm thinking so. Darrick's review comments indicate that we'll be seeing a v7. > and get this into nvdimm.git early in the cycle > when the conflict storm will be low. erk. This patchset hits mm/ a lot, and nvdimm hardly at all. Is it not practical to carry this in mm.git?
