On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 10:35:14AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > I was thinking for a while whether if you now always copy 40 bytes instead > of only d_name.len bytes cannot have any adverse performance effects > (additional cacheline fetched / dirtied) but I don't think any path copying > the name is that performance critical to matter if it would be noticeable > at all. FWIW, I'd expect it to be a slight win overall; we'll see if profiling shows otherwise, but...
