On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:18:47PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>
> It doesn't seem that ext2/3/4 are using the 0x00100000 value itself,
> but it seems the VFS is using this value for FS_DIRECTIO_FL. Should
> we reserve this in the ext4 flags also, to avoid collisions? I'm
> not sure what that flag is for, possibly to force all IO to the file
> to be uncached?
Hmm, absolutely nothing seems to use FS_DIRECTIO_FL; it looks like it
was introduced by GFS2 in commit 128e5eba in 2006 and then dropped in
commit c9f6a6bb in 2008, but we never killed the FS_DIRECTIO_FL flag
itself in include/linux/fs.h.
The summary line for c9f6a6bb is a bit amusing:
[GFS2] Remove support for unused and pointless flag
Heh.
Sounds like we should just kill it. Any objections?
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
