> seq_read() yields at most seq_file->size bytes to userspace, …
user space?
…
> $ strace -T -e read cat /proc/interrupts > /dev/null
…
> 45 read(3, "", 131072) = 0 <0.000010>
> On a system with hundreds of cpus, it would need …
CPUs?
Is it a bit nicer to separate test output and subsequent comments by blank lines?
…
> Fill up user buffer as much as possible in seq_read(), extra read
> calls can be avoided with a larger user buffer, and 2%~10% performance
> improvement would be observed:
Will it help to split such a paragraph into three sentences
(on separate lines)?
Regards,
Markus
