Re: [PATCH 03/10] iomap: add a IOMAP_F_ANON_WRITE flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 10:02:08AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Do we need to error the bio instead of submitting it if
> IOMAP_F_ANON_WRITE is set here?  Or are we relying on the block
> layer/device will reject an IO to U64_MAX and produce the EIO for us?

I'd rather not add an error return where we previously didn't for
catching a grave programmer error.  I wonder if I should also drop
the error handling in the writeback submission to be consistent?





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux