Re: [PATCH 0/5] fs/buffer: strack reduction on async read

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] fs/buffer: strack reduction on async read
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 09:53:58 -0800
Cc: hare@xxxxxxx, willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx, david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, djwong@xxxxxxxxxx, kbusch@xxxxxxxxxx, john.g.garry@xxxxxxxxxx, ritesh.list@xxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gost.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx, p.raghav@xxxxxxxxxxx, da.gomez@xxxxxxxxxxx, kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20241219062827.GA19904@lst.de>

On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 07:28:27AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> What is this strack that gets reduced here?

s/strack/stack

I seriously need a spell checker as part of my pipeline.

  Luis

References:
- [PATCH 0/5] fs/buffer: strack reduction on async read
  - From: Luis Chamberlain
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] fs/buffer: strack reduction on async read
  - From: Christoph Hellwig

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 02/10] iomap: simplify io_flags and io_type in struct iomap_ioend
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fsx: support reads/writes from buffers backed by hugepages
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/5] fs/buffer: strack reduction on async read
Next by thread: [PATCH] lsm: integrity: Allow enable/disable ima and evm with lsm= cmdline
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux