On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 at 13:04, <asmadeus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Christian Schoenebeck's suggestion was something like this -- I guess
> that's good enough for now and won't break anything (e.g. ACLs bigger
> than XATTR_SIZE_MAX), so shall we go with that instead?
Please use XATTR_SIZE_MAX. The KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE limit seems to make no
sense in this context.
Afaik the VFS layer doesn't allow getting an xattr bigger than
XATTR_SIZE_MAX anyway, and would return E2BIG for them later
regardless, so returning anything bigger wouldn't work anyway, even if
p9 tried to return such a thing up to some bigger limit.
No?
Linus
