"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx):
>> From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> On large directories sysfs_count_nlinks can be a significant
>> bottleneck, so keep a count in sysfs_dirent. If we exceed
>> the maximum number of directory entries we can store return
>> nlink of 1. An nlink of 1 matches what reiserfs does in
>> this case, and it let's find and similar utlities know that
>> we have a the directory nlink can not be used for optimization
>> purposes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> fs/sysfs/dir.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> fs/sysfs/inode.c | 15 +--------------
>> fs/sysfs/mount.c | 1 +
>> fs/sysfs/sysfs.h | 1 +
>> 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/sysfs/dir.c b/fs/sysfs/dir.c
>> index 5c4703d..1c364be 100644
>> --- a/fs/sysfs/dir.c
>> +++ b/fs/sysfs/dir.c
>> @@ -359,6 +359,7 @@ struct sysfs_dirent *sysfs_new_dirent(const char *name, umode_t mode, int type)
>> sd->s_name = name;
>> sd->s_mode = mode;
>> sd->s_flags = type;
>> + sd->s_nlink = type == SYSFS_DIR? 2:1;
>>
>> return sd;
>>
>> @@ -392,6 +393,23 @@ void sysfs_addrm_start(struct sysfs_addrm_cxt *acxt,
>> mutex_lock(&sysfs_mutex);
>> }
>>
>> +static void sysfs_dir_inc_nlink(struct sysfs_dirent *sd)
>> +{
>> + /* If we overflow force nlink to be 1 */
>> + if (sd->s_nlink > 1) {
>> + sd->s_nlink++;
>> + if (sd->s_nlink == 0)
>> + sd->s_nlink = 1;
>> + }
>> +}
>
> Now, the original code only ups nlink on parent if child is a dir.
> IIUC your code will now inc nlink for files as well. Is any userspace
> going to be confused by that?
Good point. nlink should only be upped for directories.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
