Re: silent data corruption in fuse in rc1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 12:31:51PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> This is a failure in testing.  And I don't mean "Joanne obviously didn't test
> this", I mean that we as a file system community forget that fstests isn't as
> exhaustive as we think.  I was honestly surprised to see that we don't actually
> have anything that purposely allocates large folios and then does O_DIRECT with
> them.  Now we know, Joanne already has followups for extending fsx to purposely
> allocate large folios so we can have testing coverage for this case.  Yay
> software development, we find gaps, we plug them, we move on.

Yeah, agreed.

Code coverage analysis would've also likely pointed this out.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux