Re: Regression on linux-next (next-20241203)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Borah, Chaitanya Kumar" <chaitanya.kumar.borah@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Regression on linux-next (next-20241203)
From: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 05:34:27 -0500
Cc: "Kurmi, Suresh Kumar" <suresh.kumar.kurmi@xxxxxxxxx>, "Saarinen, Jani" <jani.saarinen@xxxxxxxxx>, "intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "intel-xe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <intel-xe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <SJ1PR11MB6129DFD4D1E8805D9EC930BDB9312@SJ1PR11MB6129.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

Hello Chaitanya, my apologies for the breakage and the time spent
tracking it down.

This was found by automation and reported in
https://lore.kernel.org/all/a41eb55f-01b3-4388-a98c-cc0de15179bd@xxxxxxxxx/
and the fix picked up by mm in
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241206012431.4B593C4CED1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/.

Best.
Tamir

References:
- Regression on linux-next (next-20241203)
  - From: Borah, Chaitanya Kumar

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 02/17] mm: factor out large folio handling from folio_nr_pages() into folio_large_nr_pages()
Next by Date: Re: [QUESTION] inconsistent use of smp_mb()
Previous by thread: Regression on linux-next (next-20241203)
Next by thread: [PATCH v3] mm/readahead: fix large folio support in async readahead
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux