On (24/12/05 16:06), Joanne Koong wrote: > Interesting! Thanks for noting this. > > It looks like the choices we have here then are to either: > > * have this run in a kthread like hung-task watchdog, as you mentioned above Works for me.
On (24/12/05 16:06), Joanne Koong wrote: > Interesting! Thanks for noting this. > > It looks like the choices we have here then are to either: > > * have this run in a kthread like hung-task watchdog, as you mentioned above Works for me.