Re: [PATCH 0/2] jbd2: two straightforward fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed 04-12-24 12:00:55, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Dec 2024 09:44:05 +0800, Zhang Yi wrote:
> > From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Zhang Yi (2):
> >   jbd2: increase IO priority for writing revoke records
> >   jbd2: flush filesystem device before updating tail sequence
> > 
> > fs/jbd2/commit.c | 4 ++--
> >  fs/jbd2/revoke.c | 2 +-
> >  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > [...]
> 
> Applied to the vfs.fixes branch of the vfs/vfs.git tree.
> Patches in the vfs.fixes branch should appear in linux-next soon.

Traditionally, Ted takes jbd2 patches through his tree. For these two
patches, chances for conflicts or unexpected effects are pretty low so I
don't really care but I wanted to point that out :)

								Honza

-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux