Re: [PATCH RFC v7 00/16] fuse: fuse-over-io-uring

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 12/3/24 15:24, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 11/27/24 13:40, Bernd Schubert wrote:
>> [I removed RFC status as the design should be in place now
>> and as xfstests pass. I still reviewing patches myself, though
>> and also repeatings tests with different queue sizes.]
> 
> I left a few comments, but it looks sane. At least on the io_uring
> side nothing weird caught my eye. Cancellations might be a bit
> worrisome as usual, so would be nice to give it a good run with
> sanitizers.

Thanks a lot for your reviews, new series is in preparation, will 
send it out tomorrow to give a test run over night. I'm 
running xfstests on a kernel that has lockdep and ASAN enabled, which
is why it takes around 15 hours (with/without FOPEN_DIRECT_IO).

And definitely, cancellation/teardown is the part that I spent most
time on.


Thanks,
Bernd




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux