Re: [PATCH RFC v7 00/16] fuse: fuse-over-io-uring

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@xxxxxxx>, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v7 00/16] fuse: fuse-over-io-uring
From: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 14:45:37 +0100
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, io-uring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@xxxxxxxxx>, Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>, Ming Lei <tom.leiming@xxxxxxxxx>, David Wei <dw@xxxxxxxxxxx>, bernd@xxxxxxxxxxx
Feedback-id: id8a24192:Fastmail
In-reply-to: <20241127-fuse-uring-for-6-10-rfc4-v7-0-934b3a69baca@ddn.com>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird


On 11/27/24 14:40, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> [I removed RFC status as the design should be in place now
> and as xfstests pass. I still reviewing patches myself, though
> and also repeatings tests with different queue sizes.]

Sorry, my intend was to remove RFC status, but then forgot to
actually unset it :/

References:
- [PATCH RFC v7 00/16] fuse: fuse-over-io-uring
  - From: Bernd Schubert

Prev by Date: [PATCH RFC v7 13/16] io_uring/cmd: let cmds to know about dying task
Next by Date: Re: UML mount failure with Linux 6.11
Previous by thread: [PATCH RFC v7 13/16] io_uring/cmd: let cmds to know about dying task
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux