> So I mention the "rename and extend i_size_seqcount" as a solution > that I suspect might be acceptable if somebody has the motivation and > energy, but honestly I also think "nobody can be bothered" is > acceptable in practice. I've said it before but I'm strongly on the "let's not care" side of this rather than complicating this code unnecessarily for some weird corner case. So I'd be pretty reluctant to exited about patches for this...
