Re: [PATCH] statx.2: Document STATX_SUBVOL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24/11/2024 13:35, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
Hi Kent, Eric, John,

Thread: <https://lore.kernel.org/linux-man/20240311203221.2118219-1-kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx/T/#u>

I revisited this thread today and checked that there wasn't an updated
patch.  Would you like to send a revised version of the patch?

Hi Alex,

Wasn't this done in the following:

commit d0621648b4b5a356e86cea23e842f2591461f0cf
Author: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Thu Jun 20 13:00:17 2024 +0000

   statx.2: Document STATX_SUBVOL

   Document the new statx.stx_subvol field.

   This would be clearer if we had a proper API for walking subvolumes that
   we could refer to, but that's still coming.

Link: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20240308022914.196982-1-kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx/__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!JYMR3Qwb11MmwlhEqgGhq3ITse9gIJ2sfyZQHyiVMQsb77VfyLGvmdLonkpcrGymbqfkUZE0DnYahWZPrc-vZG1rkIHW$
   Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx>
   [jpg: mention supported FSes and formatting improvements]
   Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
   Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
   Cc: <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
   Message-ID: <20240620130017.2686511-1-john.g.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
   Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@xxxxxxxxxx>

BTW, on another totally separate topic, there is nothing for this:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/f20a786f-156a-4772-8633-66518bd09a02@xxxxxxxxxx/

right?

Thanks,
John



Have a lovely day!
Alex

On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 02:14:46PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
Hi John,

On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 10:19:05AM GMT, John Garry wrote:
Hi Alex,


On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 08:36:34AM GMT, John Garry wrote:
On 15/03/2024 13:47, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
Hi!

Was there ever an updated version of this patch?

I don't see anything for this in the man pages git yet.
When I pick a patch, I explicitly notify the author in a reply in the
same thread.  I haven't.  I commented some issues with the patch so that
the author sends some revised patch.


I wanted to send a rebased version of my series https://lore.kernel.org/linux-api/20240124112731.28579-1-john.g.garry@xxxxxxxxxx/

[it was an oversight to not cc you / linux-man@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx there]

Anyway I would like to use a proper baseline, which includes STATX_SUBVOL
info. So I will send an updated patch for STATX_SUBVOL if I don't see it
soon.

Thanks!  no problem.

Have a lovely day!
Alex


Thanks,
John


--
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>








[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux