On Sun, Nov 24, 2024 at 2:44 PM Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > No need for the extra reference count bump. > > Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c | 6 ++---- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c b/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c > index 439bd9a5ceecc4d2f4dc5dfda7cea14c3d9411ba..39f08531abc7e99c32e709a46988939f072a9abe 100644 > --- a/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c > +++ b/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c > @@ -741,17 +741,15 @@ static int ovl_prep_cu_creds(struct dentry *dentry, struct ovl_cu_creds *cc) > return err; > > if (cc->new) > - cc->old = override_creds(get_new_cred(cc->new)); > + cc->old = override_creds(cc->new); > > return 0; > } > > static void ovl_revert_cu_creds(struct ovl_cu_creds *cc) > { > - if (cc->new) { > + if (cc->new) > put_cred(revert_creds(cc->old)); > - put_cred(cc->new); > - } Same comment here, I think this will read more clearly as revert_creds(cc->old)); put_cred(cc->new); and better reflects the counterpart of ovl_prep_cu_creds(). Thanks, Amir.