On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 01:48:42PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > Kent Overstreet wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 11:39:41AM GMT, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > On Mon 02-09-24 04:52:49, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 10:41:31AM GMT, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > > On Sun 01-09-24 21:35:30, Kent Overstreet wrote: > [..] > > Kent, > > The Code of Conduct Committee received reports about your conduct in > this email discussion. > > Link to email where the violation took place: > > https://lore.kernel.org/citv2v6f33hoidq75xd2spaqxf7nl5wbmmzma4wgmrwpoqidhj@k453tmq7vdrk > > Our community works on trust and respect and has agreed to abide by the > Code of Conduct: > > Reference: https://docs.kernel.org/process/code-of-conduct.html > > The code of Conduct Committee has determined that your written abuse > of another community member required action on your part to repair the > damage to the individual and the community. You took insufficient action > to restore the community's faith in having otherwise productive technical > discussions without the fear of personal attacks. > > Following the Code of Conduct Interpretation process the TAB has approved > has approved the following recommendation: > > -- Restrict Kent Overstreet's participation in the kernel development > process during the Linux 6.13 kernel development cycle. > > - Scope: Decline all pull requests from Kent Overstreet during > the Linux 6.13 kernel development cycle. Ok. Just to be clear on what this is about though, I'm going to post publically what I wrote Michal back in September. This is about a CoC board that on the one hand, doesn't wish to follow its own rules, and on the other - I can't even make sense of.
