On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:32:04 -0500, cel@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> > > This series attempts to narrow some gaps in the current tmpfs > directory offset mechanism, based on misbehaviors reported by Yu > Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx> and Yang Erkun <yangerkun@xxxxxxxxxx>. > > It does not fully close the window on bad behavior, as noted in > the patch description of 2/2. Perhaps discussion and review can > identify improvements that further clean up the corner cases. > > [...] Applied to the vfs.fixes branch of the vfs/vfs.git tree. Patches in the vfs.fixes branch should appear in linux-next soon. Please report any outstanding bugs that were missed during review in a new review to the original patch series allowing us to drop it. It's encouraged to provide Acked-bys and Reviewed-bys even though the patch has now been applied. If possible patch trailers will be updated. Note that commit hashes shown below are subject to change due to rebase, trailer updates or similar. If in doubt, please check the listed branch. tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git branch: vfs.fixes [1/2] libfs: Return ENOSPC when the directory offset range is exhausted https://git.kernel.org/vfs/vfs/c/7f82c425d13b [2/2] libfs: Improve behavior when directory offset values wrap https://git.kernel.org/vfs/vfs/c/3e8dd5a7404a
