On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 08:54:51AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote: > I actually think it's easier for you to just fix it up according to your > needs rather than spin around on the list on it, since I'm not totally > clear on what the goal is here anyways. > > Not sure if you saw my comment here [1], but my goal is to eventually > remove this code anyways in favor of something that supports more of a > sparse folio iteration. Whether it gets removed first or reworked in the > meantime as part of broader cleanups isn't such a big deal. I just want > to point that out so it's clear it's not worth trying too hard to > beautify it. Sounds good, thanks!
