Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Kent,

On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 03:35:16PM -0500, Kent Overstreet wrote:
>       bcachefs: Kill bch2_get_next_backpointer()

As pointed out by the kbuild test robot [1], this change introduces several
-Wuninitialized warnings:

  fs/bcachefs/move.c:814:36: error: variable 'dirty_sectors' is uninitialized when used here [-Werror,-Wuninitialized]
    814 |         trace_evacuate_bucket(c, &bucket, dirty_sectors, bucket_size, fragmentation, ret);
        |                                           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
  fs/bcachefs/move.c:677:24: note: initialize the variable 'dirty_sectors' to silence this warning
    677 |         unsigned dirty_sectors, bucket_size;
        |                               ^
        |                                = 0
  fs/bcachefs/move.c:814:51: error: variable 'bucket_size' is uninitialized when used here [-Werror,-Wuninitialized]
    814 |         trace_evacuate_bucket(c, &bucket, dirty_sectors, bucket_size, fragmentation, ret);
        |                                                          ^~~~~~~~~~~
  fs/bcachefs/move.c:677:37: note: initialize the variable 'bucket_size' to silence this warning
    677 |         unsigned dirty_sectors, bucket_size;
        |                                            ^
        |                                             = 0
  fs/bcachefs/move.c:814:64: error: variable 'fragmentation' is uninitialized when used here [-Werror,-Wuninitialized]
    814 |         trace_evacuate_bucket(c, &bucket, dirty_sectors, bucket_size, fragmentation, ret);
        |                                                                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
  fs/bcachefs/move.c:678:19: note: initialize the variable 'fragmentation' to silence this warning
    678 |         u64 fragmentation;
        |                          ^
        |                           = 0
  3 errors generated.

I see you were already sent a change [2] to fix this but the fix should
go with the problematic change atomically. Build failures during the
merge window suck because they potentially hide other issues. I have a
further comment on that patch that I will send shortly.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/202411171154.RatlgkMz-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/20241117234334.722730-4-pZ010001011111@xxxxxxxxx/

Cheers,
Nathan




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux