On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:54:02 PST, Sage Weil said: > I would still like to see ceph merged for 2.6.33. It's certainly not > production ready, but it would be greatly beneficial to be in mainline for > the same reasons other file systems like btrfs and exofs were merged > early. Is the on-the-wire protocol believed to be correct, complete, and stable? How about any userspace APIs and on-disk formats? In other words.. > > The git tree includes the full patchset posted in October and incremental > > changes since then. I've tried to cram in all the anticipated protocol > > changes, but the file system is still strictly EXPERIMENTAL and is marked Anything left dangling on the changes?
Attachment:
pgpSpcpcvb5DI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
