Re: [PATCH] fs:aio: Remove TODO comment suggesting hash or array usage in io_cancel()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue 12-11-24 17:08:34, Mohammed Anees wrote:
> The comment suggests a hash or array approach to
> store the active requests. Currently it iterates
> through all the active requests and when found
> deletes the requested request, in the linked list.
> However io_cancel() isn’t a frequently used operation,
> and optimizing it wouldn’t bring a substantial benefit
> to real users and the increased complexity of maintaining
> a hashtable for this would be significant and will slow
> down other operation. Therefore remove this TODO 
> to avoid people spending time improving this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mohammed Anees <pvmohammedanees2003@xxxxxxxxx>

Looks good. Feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>

								Honza

> ---
>  fs/aio.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/aio.c b/fs/aio.c
> index e8920178b50f..72e3970f4225 100644
> --- a/fs/aio.c
> +++ b/fs/aio.c
> @@ -2191,7 +2191,6 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(io_cancel, aio_context_t, ctx_id, struct iocb __user *, iocb,
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	spin_lock_irq(&ctx->ctx_lock);
> -	/* TODO: use a hash or array, this sucks. */
>  	list_for_each_entry(kiocb, &ctx->active_reqs, ki_list) {
>  		if (kiocb->ki_res.obj == obj) {
>  			ret = kiocb->ki_cancel(&kiocb->rw);
> -- 
> 2.47.0
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux