Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] iomap: lift zeroed mapping handling into iomap_zero_range()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 07:42:44AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> In preparation for special handling of subranges, lift the zeroed
> mapping logic from the iterator into the caller. Since this puts the
> pagecache dirty check and flushing in the same place, streamline the
> comments a bit as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 64 +++++++++++++++---------------------------
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> index ef0b68bccbb6..a78b5b9b3df3 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> @@ -1350,40 +1350,12 @@ static inline int iomap_zero_iter_flush_and_stale(struct iomap_iter *i)
>  	return filemap_write_and_wait_range(mapping, i->pos, end);
>  }
>  
> -static loff_t iomap_zero_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, bool *did_zero,
> -		bool *range_dirty)
> +static loff_t iomap_zero_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, bool *did_zero)
>  {
> -	const struct iomap *srcmap = iomap_iter_srcmap(iter);
>  	loff_t pos = iter->pos;
>  	loff_t length = iomap_length(iter);
>  	loff_t written = 0;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * We must zero subranges of unwritten mappings that might be dirty in
> -	 * pagecache from previous writes. We only know whether the entire range
> -	 * was clean or not, however, and dirty folios may have been written
> -	 * back or reclaimed at any point after mapping lookup.
> -	 *
> -	 * The easiest way to deal with this is to flush pagecache to trigger
> -	 * any pending unwritten conversions and then grab the updated extents
> -	 * from the fs. The flush may change the current mapping, so mark it
> -	 * stale for the iterator to remap it for the next pass to handle
> -	 * properly.
> -	 *
> -	 * Note that holes are treated the same as unwritten because zero range
> -	 * is (ab)used for partial folio zeroing in some cases. Hole backed
> -	 * post-eof ranges can be dirtied via mapped write and the flush
> -	 * triggers writeback time post-eof zeroing.
> -	 */
> -	if (srcmap->type == IOMAP_HOLE || srcmap->type == IOMAP_UNWRITTEN) {
> -		if (*range_dirty) {
> -			*range_dirty = false;
> -			return iomap_zero_iter_flush_and_stale(iter);
> -		}
> -		/* range is clean and already zeroed, nothing to do */
> -		return length;
> -	}
> -
>  	do {
>  		struct folio *folio;
>  		int status;
> @@ -1433,24 +1405,32 @@ iomap_zero_range(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t len, bool *did_zero,
>  	bool range_dirty;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Zero range wants to skip pre-zeroed (i.e. unwritten) mappings, but
> -	 * pagecache must be flushed to ensure stale data from previous
> -	 * buffered writes is not exposed. A flush is only required for certain
> -	 * types of mappings, but checking pagecache after mapping lookup is
> -	 * racy with writeback and reclaim.
> +	 * Zero range can skip mappings that are zero on disk so long as
> +	 * pagecache is clean. If pagecache was dirty prior to zero range, the
> +	 * mapping converts on writeback completion and so must be zeroed.
>  	 *
> -	 * Therefore, check the entire range first and pass along whether any
> -	 * part of it is dirty. If so and an underlying mapping warrants it,
> -	 * flush the cache at that point. This trades off the occasional false
> -	 * positive (and spurious flush, if the dirty data and mapping don't
> -	 * happen to overlap) for simplicity in handling a relatively uncommon
> -	 * situation.
> +	 * The simplest way to deal with this across a range is to flush
> +	 * pagecache and process the updated mappings. To avoid an unconditional
> +	 * flush, check pagecache state and only flush if dirty and the fs
> +	 * returns a mapping that might convert on writeback.
>  	 */
>  	range_dirty = filemap_range_needs_writeback(inode->i_mapping,
>  					pos, pos + len - 1);
> +	while ((ret = iomap_iter(&iter, ops)) > 0) {
> +		const struct iomap *s = iomap_iter_srcmap(&iter);
> +
> +		if (s->type == IOMAP_HOLE || s->type == IOMAP_UNWRITTEN) {
> +			loff_t p = iomap_length(&iter);

Another dumb nit: blank line after the declaration.

With that fixed, this is ok by me for further testing:
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>

--D

> +			if (range_dirty) {
> +				range_dirty = false;
> +				p = iomap_zero_iter_flush_and_stale(&iter);
> +			}
> +			iter.processed = p;
> +			continue;
> +		}
>  
> -	while ((ret = iomap_iter(&iter, ops)) > 0)
> -		iter.processed = iomap_zero_iter(&iter, did_zero, &range_dirty);
> +		iter.processed = iomap_zero_iter(&iter, did_zero);
> +	}
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iomap_zero_range);
> -- 
> 2.47.0
> 
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux