On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 10:44:08AM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > On 12/10/2009 07:15 AM, Nick Piggin wrote: > > > > Al, any chance to merge patches 1 and 2 upstream early in this round? They > > should be fairly non intrusive and back compatible. Then I can get the > > filesystem specific patches to their maintainers and you won't have to > > bother with them. > > > > ecryptfs is being fixed to use notify_change rather than vmtruncate (which > > is anyway buggy today), so that won't be a problem. > > > > I think we'll be able to get rid of old protocol completely within just > > a couple of releases. Jan and Christoph have made pretty good progress > > there. > > > > Nick Hi. > > I want to do the exofs conversion. Is there a public git-tree with all this that > I can base my work, and run tests? > > Thanks > Boaz Hi Boaz, I don't have any git trees published. Apart from merging the patch by hand, I should hope it goes upstream with Al's vfs merge. If you've got patches based on the previous patchset in Al's tree, then it is identical except that we don't switch those helper functions with the .truncate_kludge = 1 flag but instead use _newtrunc variants. Thanks, Nick -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
