On Tue 08-12-09 09:42:09, Nick Piggin wrote:
> I also have commented a possible bug in existing ext2 code, marked with XXX.
>
> Cc: linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx>
...
> @@ -752,8 +764,8 @@ int __ext2_write_begin(struct file *file
> loff_t pos, unsigned len, unsigned flags,
> struct page **pagep, void **fsdata)
> {
> - return block_write_begin(file, mapping, pos, len, flags, pagep, fsdata,
> - ext2_get_block);
> + return block_write_begin_newtrunc(file, mapping, pos, len, flags,
> + pagep, fsdata, ext2_get_block);
> }
OK, but you should update the code in dir.c using __ext2_write_begin,
shouldn't you?
> +static int ext2_write_end(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping,
> + loff_t pos, unsigned len, unsigned copied,
> + struct page *page, void *fsdata)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied, page, fsdata);
> + if (ret < len)
> + ext2_write_failed(mapping, pos + len);
> + return ret;
> }
OK, when doing this, please also update ext2_commit_chunk in dir.c...
> +static void ext2_truncate_blocks(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset)
> +{
> + /*
> + * XXX: it seems like a bug here that we don't allow
> + * IS_APPEND inode to have blocks-past-i_size trimmed off.
> + * review and fix this.
> + *
> + * Also would be nice to be able to handle IO errors and such,
> + * but that's probably too much to ask.
> + */
> + if (!(S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) ||
> + S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode)))
> + return;
> + if (ext2_inode_is_fast_symlink(inode))
> + return;
> + if (IS_APPEND(inode) || IS_IMMUTABLE(inode))
> + return;
Yes, I'd remove IS_APPEND check from here.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
