On Dec. 07, 2009, 22:10 +0200, " J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 11:30:51AM +0200, Benny Halevy wrote:
>> From: Dean Hildebrand <seattleplus@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> [was pnfsd: Add use of pnfs exchange flags]
>> Should this code be surrounded by CONFIG_PNFSD?
>
> Might be nice, but I suppose it's not important.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Dean Hildebrand <dhildeb@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> index 9ecbc25..dc9d553 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> @@ -1349,6 +1349,10 @@ nfsd4_create_session(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
>> cr_ses->flags &= ~SESSION4_PERSIST;
>> cr_ses->flags &= ~SESSION4_RDMA;
>>
>> + if (!(unconf->cl_exchange_flags & EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_MDS) &&
>> + (unconf->cl_exchange_flags & EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_DS))
>> + cr_ses->flags &= ~SESSION4_BACK_CHAN;
>> +
>
> Might be easier to read as:
>
> if (is_ds_only_session(unconf))
> cr_ses->flags &= ~SESSION4_BACK_CHAN;
>
> with is_ds_only_session() defined in the obvious way.
Yeah. Actually we have exchgid_is_ds_only() defined for the client
as follows:
static inline bool exchgid_is_ds_only(struct nfs_client *clp)
{
u32 mask = EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_DS | EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_MDS;
return (clp->cl_exchange_flags & mask) == EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_DS;
}
we can define it as common code working on the exchange flags
rather than on the high level client structure...
Benny
>
> --b.
>
>> if (cr_ses->flags & SESSION4_BACK_CHAN) {
>> unconf->cl_cb_xprt = rqstp->rq_xprt;
>> svc_xprt_get(unconf->cl_cb_xprt);
>> --
>> 1.6.5.1
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
