Re: [PATCH 02/10] fsnotify: introduce pre-content permission event

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Aug 3, 2024 at 6:52 PM Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 6:31 PM Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu 25-07-24 14:19:39, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > > From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > The new FS_PRE_ACCESS permission event is similar to FS_ACCESS_PERM,
> > > but it meant for a different use case of filling file content before
> > > access to a file range, so it has slightly different semantics.
> > >
> > > Generate FS_PRE_ACCESS/FS_ACCESS_PERM as two seperate events, same as
> > > we did for FS_OPEN_PERM/FS_OPEN_EXEC_PERM.
> > >
> > > FS_PRE_MODIFY is a new permission event, with similar semantics as
> > > FS_PRE_ACCESS, which is called before a file is modified.
> > >
> > > FS_ACCESS_PERM is reported also on blockdev and pipes, but the new
> > > pre-content events are only reported for regular files and dirs.
> > >
> > > The pre-content events are meant to be used by hierarchical storage
> > > managers that want to fill the content of files on first access.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The patch looks good. Just out of curiosity:
> >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h b/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h
> > > index 8be029bc50b1..21e72b837ec5 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h
> > > @@ -56,6 +56,9 @@
> > >  #define FS_ACCESS_PERM               0x00020000      /* access event in a permissions hook */
> > >  #define FS_OPEN_EXEC_PERM    0x00040000      /* open/exec event in a permission hook */
> > >
> > > +#define FS_PRE_ACCESS                0x00100000      /* Pre-content access hook */
> > > +#define FS_PRE_MODIFY                0x00200000      /* Pre-content modify hook */
> >
> > Why is a hole left here in the flag space?
>
> Can't remember.
>
> Currently we have a draft design for two more events
> FS_PATH_ACCESS, FS_PATH_MODIFY
> https://github.com/amir73il/man-pages/commits/fan_pre_path
>
> So might have been a desire to keep the pre-events group on the nibble.

Funny story.

I straced a program with latest FS_PRE_ACCESS (0x00080000) and
see what I got:

fanotify_mark(3, FAN_MARK_ADD|FAN_MARK_MOUNT,
FAN_CLOSE_WRITE|FAN_OPEN_PERM|FAN_ACCESS_PERM|FAN_DIR_MODIFY|FAN_ONDIR,
AT_FDCWD, "/vdd") = 0

"FAN_DIR_MODIFY"! a blast from the past [1]

It would have been nice if we reserved 0x00080000 for FAN_PATH_MODIFY [2]
to be a bit less confusing for users with old strace.

WDYT?

Thanks,
Amir.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20200612093343.5669-18-amir73il@xxxxxxxxx/
[2] https://github.com/amir73il/man-pages/commits/fan_pre_path





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux